When is condorcet jury theorem valid

Consequently, a defense of virtue signalling would need to engage with these findings and show that despite our strong tendencies for conformism, our judgements are sufficiently independent for the Condorcet Jury Theorem to apply.

This suggests new directions for the debate about the epistemology of virtue signalling. Abstract One might think that if the majority of virtue signallers judge that a proposition is true, then there is significant evidence for the truth of that proposition.

More Contact us Publish with us Subscribe Accessibility. Print Email. Heckelman and Nicholas R. Miller This Handbook provides an overview of interdisciplinary research related to social choice and voting that is intended for a broad audience.

Expert contributors from various fields present critical summaries of the existing literature, including intuitive explanations of technical terminology and well-known theorems, suggesting new directions for research. You do not have access to this content. Extract 9. Condorcet Jury Theorem Investment in human capital Endogenous skills. JEL classification: D Submitting the report failed.

Please, try again. If the error persists, contact the administrator by writing to support infona. You can change the active elements on the page buttons and links by pressing a combination of keys:. I accept. Polski English Login or register account. The invalidity of the Condorcet Jury Theorem under endogenous decisional skills. Berend, Daniel, and Jacob Paroush. Berend, Daniel, and Luba Sapir. Black, Duncan. The Theory of Committees and Elections.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boland, Philip J. Series D The Statistician 38 3 : — Condorcet De, Marquis. Dietrich, Franz. Dietrich, Franz, and Christian List. Dietrich, Franz, and Kai Spiekermann.

Estlund, David M. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.