Source: Lakes of Missouri. Within a body of a liquid, a molecule will not experience a net force because the forces by the neighboring molecules all cancel out diagram. However for a molecule on the surface of the liquid, there will be a net inward force since there will be no attractive force acting from above. This inward net force causes the molecules on the surface to contract and to resist being stretched or broken. Thus the surface is under tension, which is probably where the name "surface tension" came from.
Source: Woodrow Wilson Foundation. Due to the surface tension, small objects will "float" on the surface of a fluid, as long as the object cannot break through and separate the top layer of water molecules.
When an object is on the surface of the fluid, the surface under tension will behave like an elastic membrane. Water striders are able to walk on top of water due to a combination of several factors. Water striders use the high surface tension of water and long, hydrophobic legs to help them stay above water. Water striders use this surface tension to their advantage through their highly adapted legs and distributed weight.
The legs of a water strider are long and slender, allowing the weight of the water strider body to be distributed over a large surface area.
The legs are strong, but have flexibility that allows the water striders to keep their weight evenly distributed and flow with the water movement.
Hydrofuge hairs line the body surface of the water strider. Source: Georgia State University. Looking at water, you might think that it's the most simple thing around. Pure water is practically colorless, odorless, and tasteless. But it's not at all simple and plain and it is vital for all life on Earth. Where there is water there is life, and where water is scarce, life has to struggle or just "throw in the towel. Why the surface tension of mercury is so high will also be evident after reading this short blog post.
The surface tension arises due to cohesive interactions between the molecules in the liquid. At the bulk of the liquid, the molecules have neighboring molecules on each side. Molecules are pulling each other equally in all directions causing a net force of zero. However, at the interface, the liquid molecules have only half of the neighboring liquid molecules compared to the bulk of the liquid.
This makes the molecule associate more strongly with the molecules at its sides and causes a net inward force towards the liquid. This force resists the breakage of the surface and is called surface tension. To understand this we need to think of the bonds between the molecules. As explained, the cohesive force between the molecules causes surface tension. The stronger the cohesive force, the stronger the surface tension. The water molecule has two hydrogen atoms bond to an oxygen atom through covalent bonding.
It therefore costs energy to create new surfaces and indeed, reasonable estimates of the surface tensions of apolar liquids can be obtained in this way. Here we study the surface relaxation of water and find that water exhibits a dynamic surface tension with a relaxation time that is on the order of 1 ms or larger, indicating that an essential ingredient is missing for understanding the value of the water surface tension.
We study the formation and breakup of droplets of water emanating from an orifice Figure 1. Drop formation has received much attention recently and it was shown that the breakup mechanism is universal for different liquids, meaning that the form of the breakup and its time dependence are uniquely determined by the forces acting on the liquid neck that separates the main drop from the orifice.
Consequently, if one knows the prefactor A , one can infer the surface tension from the drop formation dynamics in a situation where the breakup process creates freshly formed air—water interface at a diverging rate. Figure 1. Pinch-off images at subsequent stages of the droplet pinch-off process. The minimum neck diameter is obtained from ultrarapid camera movies Determination of the Universal Prefactor.
Despite the fact that the prefactor A should be universal and therefore independent of any initial conditions or the nature of the inviscid fluid itself, there is considerable uncertainty in the literature as to what the value of A in eq 1 should be. Most published experimental results were obtained from ultrarapid imaging and suggest prefactors of 0. In certain simulations, the presented asymptotics even seem to display a time dependence that is wholly inconsistent with there being a universal asymptotic dynamics.
These remarkable discrepancies warrant an in-depth investigation of this fundamental hydrodynamics problem. This is beyond the scope of the present paper and will be addressed at in a separate study. In the present work we will first provide an unambiguous determination of the prefactor using different simple liquids and subsequently use the derived value for A as a reference for the determination of the water surface tension of a pristine water—air interface.
We follow the thinning dynamics using an ultra high-speed camera attached to a microscope to have both maximal temporal and spatial resolution. For water, however, the identical experiment is not on the same line, and shows a systematic deviation. Previous experiments on water, helium, and mercury breakup do not agree on the prefactor. We therefore use the precise and universal prefactor obtained in our experiments on a series of other liquids of known surface tension.
The surface tensions were verified independently on the liquids used in the snap-off experiments. Figure 2. Determination of the prefactor in eq 1. By plotting the data in this way, a stringent test is obtained for the applicability of the scaling; the slope C of the fitted lines can then be used to determine the prefactor A. Water, D 2 O, and sodium chloride solution show a significant deviation from the theoretical prediction and are thus not taken into consideration for the calculation of the universal prefactor.
The uncontested positive sign of the surface potential of water implies that its surface charge correspondingly carries a net negative sign in equilibrium and at neutral pH.
We therefore now investigate the effect of pH. Effect of pH. Such a dynamic surface tension is well-known for surface-active agents, and, indeed, the same experiment as done here in the presence of surfactants shows that close to drop breakup, the surface tension is significantly higher than the equilibrium one, just as is observed here.
In our experiment, we can easily change the bulk concentration of protons or hydronium ions by several orders of magnitude by adjusting the pH with either acid HCl or base NaOH. However, the data show that neither of these additions changes the short-time value of the dynamic surface tension Figure 2 A. A relaxation time independent of the bulk concentration can be obtained if there is an adsorption barrier at the surface that is the rate-limiting step for the arrival of molecules from the bulk onto the surface.
This is, for instance, frequently encountered for charged surfactants, 28 where the charged surfactants at the surface constitute an electrostatic barrier for the adsorption of further charged molecules. Thus, the data would only be consistent with the existence of an adsorption energy barrier that comes from a different origin.
However, what the physical mechanism would be is unclear. Effect of Salt Concentration. A related check of the ionic redistribution explanation is to see whether there is a characteristic time for the depletion of certain species from the interface. The obvious approach for studying dynamic depletion effects is to study salt solutions. Salts are strongly depleted from the aqueous interface, which in equilibrium increases the surface tension close to the values that are found here for the dynamic tension.
In addition, large amounts of salt strongly screen any electrostatic interaction between the surface and the bulk and should therefore prevent adsorption of any charged moieties.
Surprisingly, we could not detect any effect of the salt concentration on the surface relaxation behavior on short time scales Figure 3 B. The various salt solutions Figure 3 A again behave very similarly to water with a similarly high prefactor compared to the simple liquids.
Figure 3. Effect of salt. A Apparent prefactors obtained from pinch-off experiments. The derived prefactor appears to be independent of the salt concentration. B Pinch-off dynamics of aqueous solutions at early times. Water and brine display an almost identical surface relaxation mechanism with surface tension values of 90 mN m —1 for the pristine interface.
The data overlap since the increase in surface tension induced by the addition of salt is similar to the increase in density. Our ultrarapid camera experiments on droplet formation and breakup of different pure liquids therefore provide strong evidence for the existence of a high dynamic surface tension for water and various aqueous solutions on an approximately millisecond time scale.
In the past, higher than equilibrium surface tension values for water have been reported on short time scales. However, they have all remained highly controversial due to methodological and analytical shortcomings.
However, again, the suitability of the oscillating jet method for determining the surface tension of pristine surfaces on a submillisecond time scale has remained controversial: the associated hydrodynamics are incompletely understood which, in turn, entails considerable uncertainties in the complex analysis procedure.
The experimental procedure is very robust, and the associated pinch-off dynamics is very well understood for inviscid fluids. Taken together, we were able to unambiguously relate the drop breakup dynamics to the surface tension of a wide variety of pure liquids with the exception of pure, heavy, and salty water.
For aqueous systems, a considerable and systematic deviation was found. The origin of the slow surface relaxation process, which a dynamic surface tension implies, remains, however, incompletely understood. Various theories have been proposed in the past to account for this phenomenon. A much-discussed idea 18, is that ion adsorption processes in the first fraction of a millisecond after surface creation are directly responsible for the observed high surface tension.
We have shown here that, for pure water, this indeed gives the correct order of magnitude. This is only possible if bulk diffusion or an electrostatic energy barrier at the surface are not the rate-limiting steps for OH — adsorption. An alternative and rather straightforward argument goes that the observed surface tension relaxation is merely due to traces of contaminant surfactants that are, in practice, very hard to avoid. However, it has been shown in both theory 36 and experiments 25, 26 that, in drop breakup experiments, the diverging rate of surface formation makes the adsorption or even presence of surfactants irrelevant, at least close to breakup.
Further, these contaminants can only reduce the surface tension. In addition, the characteristic time for adsorption of surfactants at low concentrations lies in the range of several milliseconds and should be even higher for very small contaminant concentrations, 37 which again shows that impurities should be irrelevant on our submillisecond time scale.
Another possible explanation, perhaps related to the collective nature of the dipole fluctuations, would be a slow reorientation dynamics near the surface. For instance, flows have been shown to dampen out the capillary wave fluctuations of the surface and hence to increase the tension. In conclusion, we are at present unable to offer a complete explanation for our results.
In spite of this, the implications are rather large: the observed high dynamic tension should, for instance, be relevant for spray formation, jet destabilization, drop impact, and drop formation as there are very short time scale surface dynamics in all of these processes. Details of employed experimental materials and methods PDF. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses.
Woutersen, Y. Nagata, and M. Bonn for very helpful discussions. View Author Information. Cite this: J. Article Views In a sample of water, there are two types of molecules. Those that are on the outside, exterior, and those that are on the inside, interior. The interior molecules are attracted to all the molecules around them, while the exterior molecules are attracted to only the other surface molecules and to those below the surface.
This makes it so that the energy state of the molecules on the interior is much lower than that of the molecules on the exterior. Because of this, the molecules try to maintain a minimum surface area, thus allowing more molecules to have a lower energy state. This is what creates what is referred to as surface tension. The water molecules attract one another due to the water's polar property. The hydrogen ends, which are positive in comparison to the negative ends of the oxygen cause water to "stick" together.
This is why there is surface tension and takes a certain amount of energy to break these intermolecular bonds. Same goes for other liquids, even hydrophobic liquids such as oil.
0コメント